Talk:Eightfold Rune: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Eightfold Rune
More actions
Latest comment: 19 September by Admin in topic No Appearance in the first Suikoden?
Antimatzist (talk | contribs) →No Appearance in the first Suikoden?: new section |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Iirc the rune itself is never mentioned in the game, but since we can assume Yuber always wore it, it should also appear i the first Suikoden, right? If true, this section should also be updated: [[27 True Runes#True Runes in the series]] [[User:Antimatzist|Antimatzist]] ([[User talk:Antimatzist|talk]]) 07:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC) | Iirc the rune itself is never mentioned in the game, but since we can assume Yuber always wore it, it should also appear i the first Suikoden, right? If true, this section should also be updated: [[27 True Runes#True Runes in the series]] [[User:Antimatzist|Antimatzist]] ([[User talk:Antimatzist|talk]]) 07:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:After checking the 2001 encyclopedia, this is correct. [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 17:18, 19 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:18, 19 September 2025
No Appearance in the first Suikoden?
Iirc the rune itself is never mentioned in the game, but since we can assume Yuber always wore it, it should also appear i the first Suikoden, right? If true, this section should also be updated: 27 True Runes#True Runes in the series Antimatzist (talk) 07:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- After checking the 2001 encyclopedia, this is correct. Admin (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2025 (UTC)